Daniel Craig’s interview

Daniel Craig’s James Bond is already the most successful 007 ever, What next?

Daniel Craig’s interview

If you want to know how James Bond – sorry, we mean Daniel Craig – starts the day, we can tell you. Two double espressos with honey. Plus poached eggs on toast. With another double espresso to follow. So basically: caffeine, more caffeine and some more caffeine, with honey to soften the blow. And some eggs. Craig needs all the help he can get when we meet in early July; the 47-year-old has just finished an epic eight-month shoot for Spectre, the latest Bond movie. It’s the British actor’s fourth outing as Bond, and his second with director Sam Mendes, after the huge success of Skyfall – which in 2012 took more than US$1 billion (Dhs3.6 billion) at the global box office. So no pressure then. Another double espresso, please…

Craig is exhausted, but he’s also on a high from two years of intensive work – first getting the story right in close collaboration with Mendes and the film’s writers and producers. Then came the shoot, hopping back and forth between Pinewood Studios near London and Mexico City, Morocco, the Austrian Alps and Rome. He thinks – thinks – Spectre is going to be good, a stylish, classic Bond movie, and Craig is not an actor who talks rubbish. He’s blunt. He’s thoughtful. He’s wary of being precious. But he’s obviously nervous, too, about unleashing the film onto the world. At one point, he pauses and a look of horror passes over his bright, piercing blue eyes. “Hubris is a terrible thing in this business,” he says, checking his own enthusiasm. “I just pray the movie is going to be as great as I think it is.”

You described Skyfall as “Bond with bells on”. So how would you describe Spectre? Same bells, different tune?
There you go, that’s perfect! The complicated answer, without me having to think of some clever line, is that Skyfall did really well and broke all sorts of records and was a massive success. Then we had to do another one – which for all of us, the director Sam Mendes included, felt incredibly daunting. Once we started, we realised we couldn’t think about Skyfall. We had to think about this film. So if that was bells on, there’s more of everything in this film. It felt completely the right thing to do. We’ve got the character of Moneypenny back, and Q, and now Ralph Fiennes is playing M, so it was, like: right, let’s get all of them into the story. Things started building from there. Everyone’s been banging on to me about the gadgets. “Where are the gadgets?” Before it hasn’t felt right, and it’s not like we’ve made this one heavily into gadgets, but we’ve snuck a lot of stuff in. So, yes, it’s got more bells!

Did you always plan to play Bond for a fourth time? It's been ten years now.
Well, I was contracted to do another one. That was all set up. But at the studio there was a real keenness to get it done as soon as possible. In fact, there was a conversation at one point that went: “Let’s film two movies back to back.” I just went: “You’re out of your minds.” In the nicest possible way. They’re just too big.

Can you imagine doing another Bond movie?
Now? I’d rather break this glass and slash my wrists. No, not at the moment. Not at all. I’m over it at the moment. We’re done. All I want to do is move on.

View Everything you need to know about Bond
View Your guide to Spectre
View Sam Mendes interview

Move on from Bond for good?
I haven’t given it any thought. For at least a year or two, I just don’t want to think about it. I don’t know what the next step is. Not because I’m being cagey. Who knows? At the moment, we’ve done it. I’m not in discussion with anybody about anything. If I did another Bond movie, it would only be for the money.

There was more humour in Skyfall than in Casino Royale or Quantum of Solace. Will that continue with Spectre?
It was conscious. I’d be lying if I said it wasn’t. I just think there’s room for it. Especially when you’ve got someone like Sam Mendes at the helm who is the truth police – and I’m the truth police, too. We’re always asking: is this real? Then the humour can happen. But it’s not gag writing. They’re not the kind of movies I want to make. Really, really, really good gags are few and far between. Those writers are out there, but they’re rare. Look at people like Seth Rogen, a lot of that is improvisation. They’re funny people and I’m not used to doing that sort of thing. But we’ve got people like Ben Whishaw and Rory Kinnear who are very easy with humour. But, yes, short answer: we've put more humour in.

Were you involved in bringing Sam Mendes back to direct?
Yes, I was begging him. Begging him. They offered him loads of money, of course, but I was also begging him to do it. They wanted to make the movie very quickly at first and he said he couldn’t. He just didn’t have time. He had three theatre productions he was working on – Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, the revival of Cabaret and King Lear. How he does it I have no idea. They were saying: “We have to get moving on the script,” and he was like: “No, I can’t do it.”

Were you disappointed when it looked like he wouldn’t do it?
I was gutted. I felt we’d just got somewhere, me and him. Skyfall was very fraught. He’ll happily tell you. The two of us butted heads a lot and had lots of very passionate discussions. But we got through it. We got through his nervousness – it was his first Bond movie. He came on a set with a crew I’ve known for a number of years. We’re all pals. He’s thinking: what’s the dynamic here? And I’m nervous because I’ve asked him to do the film and I want him to be comfortable, but I also want to push him. And we’re not just strangers, we know each other, and so we can shout at one another. It became a proper friendship on this new movie. I felt massively supported by him, in a different way. He had my back and I certainly had his.

Playing James Bond is a lot about how you look – the clothes, the walk, the fitness. Do you ever get fed up with all that?
It’s a drag. The best acting is when you’re not concerned about the surface. And Bond is the opposite of that. You have to be bothered about how you’re looking. It’s a struggle. I know that how Bond wears a suit and walks into a room is important. But as an actor I don’t want to care about what I look like. So I have to play with both things. In a way that works, as that’s Bond: he looks good and he doesn’t care what you think he looks like.

The most famous image of you as Bond is you in your blue trunks coming out of the sea in Casino Royale. How do you feel when you look at that now ten years on?
I don’t look at it weeping, going “Wasn’t I beautiful!” Everything like that has been a voyage of discovery. I was aware of what was needed to be Bond but it still goes against everything I believe in. I’m not the coolest human being. I wish I was, but I’m not. And I don’t pretend to be. But playing James Bond, you have to be cool, and what is cool? You could write a dissertation on it. That was a big accident, that particular shot. I was pretending to swim in shallow water and then I stood up and walked out of the water. I was pretending to be cool to swim, I thought it looked stupid and stood up and I walked off – and that was the shot!

Do you ever look back and think: How did I end upplaying James Bond?
I know, it’s ludicrous, it’s ridiculous. When I first got approached, I just thought: You’ve made a mistake. I don’t know, it’s still crazy.

What does playing Bond not allow you to do as an actor?
Every idea I’ve had for a Bond movie I’ve stuck into this one. The Bond bank is dry. If you’re asking me what would I do with another Bond movie? I haven’t a clue. Go into space? Let’s do it! They already did it. Let’s do it again.

No, my question is what does Bond not allow you to do generally as an actor, beyond Bond?
Oh I see. Bond allows me to do anything I want to in some respects. But it’s changed my working life in an incredible way. There are more opportunities. I could do many, many things. But it takes an awful amount of time. If anything, the restriction is that it is incredibly time-consuming.

Bond has a special relationship with women. Is he a dinosaur?
I think it’s okay for him – not to be misogynistic, that’s too strong a word – to find women a little difficult, shall we say. That’s a character thing. If you judge him completely on that, I think you’re lost. And that comes with casting. You do your best to make the parts for the women in the movie as strong and as interesting as possible. Otherwise, I’m like: forget it. Because that world, as far as I’m concerned, doesn’t exist anymore. Characters like that exist. People do think like that, so there’s the conflict. Put that in a movie. Bond still wants [women]. It’s about how the women change him. That, for me, is interesting.

Do you care who plays Bond after you?
I don’t care. Good luck to them! All I care about is that if I stop doing these things we’ve left it in a good place and people pick it up and make it better. Make it better, that’s all.

You won’t be backseat-driving then?
Oh, no. How sad would that be? “Oh look, it’s Daniel Craig, he’s on set again!” No!

And if someone rang you and said, “I’ve taken the 007 gig,” what advice would you give them?
Don’t be [rubbish]! Embrace it. Some clichéd line like that. But no, just make sure you’re great. You’ve got to step up. People do not make movies like this any more. You’ve got to push yourself as far as you can. It’s worth it, it’s James Bond.

Spectre is out in cinemas across from Friday November 6.

Be the first to get all the latest Bahrain news, reviews and deals into your inbox by signing up to our free newsletter, click here to sign up.

More from Film & TV

Movie review: An exercise in how not to adapt a beloved YA novel

Movie review: Spike Lee's look at African-American soldiers in Vietnam

Pete Davidson’s lo-fi charms can’t energise this Judd Apatow slacker-com

You'll find a DeLorean time machine, plenty of hair gel and the perfect blockbuster in our list of the best ’80s movies

Every Best Picture Oscar award-winning movies of the 21st century


Follow us